The Coincidental Evolution of Virulence Partially Explains the Virulence in a Generalist Entomopathogenic.

PURPOSE: The parasites' virulence is labile after jumping to a new host species, and it might derivate in gaining virulence against a new host as a side effect of living in a non-host environment (coincidental evolution of virulence hypothesis). METHODS: To test this hypothesis, we monitored the experimental evolution of the Rhabditis regina nematode for over 290 generations (4 years) in three environments (strains): (1) the natural host, Phyllophaga polyphylla, (2) an alternate host, Tenebrio molitor, and (3) saprophytic medium (beef; the food that may provide evidence for the coincidental evolution of virulence). Each strain was exposed to P. polyphylla, T. molitor, or Galleria mellonella. We compared the host survival and immune response (proPO, PO, and lytic activity) of infected versus uninfected hosts. RESULTS: The saprophytic nematodes gained virulence only against G. mellonella. However, the P. polyphylla strain was more effective in killing P. polyphylla than T. molitor, and the T. molitor strain was more effective against T. molitor than P. polyphylla. Additionally, one dauer larva was sufficient to kill the hosts. Finally, the immune response did not differ between the challenged and control groups. CONCLUSION: The coincidental evolution of virulence partially explains our results, but they might also support the short-sighted hypothesis. Additionally, we found evidence for immunomodulation because nematodes passed unnoticed to the immune response. It is crucial to analyze the virulence of entomopathogens from the point of view of the evolution of virulence to be aware of potential scenarios that might limit biological control.

The costs of the immune memory within generations.

Immune response is evolutionary costly, but it is not clear whether these costs affect energetic expenditure (short-term cost), growth (medium-term cost), or reproduction (long-term cost). We tested the costs of immune memory in Tenebrio molitor against Metarhizium brunneum. To do this, we used two groups of T. molitor larvae: (a) the control group, which was injected first with Tween solution and 10 days later with M. brunneum and (b) the memory group, which was first injected with M. brunneum and 10 days later with M. brunneum. Compared to controls, larvae of the memory group were more likely to survive, but they also had an increased metabolic rate (CO2 production), spent a long time before becoming pupae, and had a shorter time from pupae to adulthood. In the adult stage, control females preferred control males, but there was no significant difference in the preference of memory females. Finally, control and memory males preferred control females. These results confirm that immune memory has costs in terms of energetic expenditure, growth, and reproduction. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experimental demonstration that immune memory in larvae is traded-off with adult sexual selection involving mate choice.